Now these days there is a big noise of fdi in India, A long debate held whether it is profitable for
public or not?, on parliament both in Loksabha and Rajya Sabha. And bill of fdi passed in both
loksabha and rajya sabha by voting. In live discussion held in parliament all saw, Majority of mebers
argued against fdi, and claimed it is lossful. But question arises ? When majority of people in live
telecast declared fdi a loss of public then how it got passed ? And question still stand whether fdi is
profitable or lossful ? At one end majority of members argued against fdi then why bill of loss being
passed ? In order to get any bill passed two third majority is necessary. and majority were fully
against fdi. What a misleading ?
public or not?, on parliament both in Loksabha and Rajya Sabha. And bill of fdi passed in both
loksabha and rajya sabha by voting. In live discussion held in parliament all saw, Majority of mebers
argued against fdi, and claimed it is lossful. But question arises ? When majority of people in live
telecast declared fdi a loss of public then how it got passed ? And question still stand whether fdi is
profitable or lossful ? At one end majority of members argued against fdi then why bill of loss being
passed ? In order to get any bill passed two third majority is necessary. and majority were fully
against fdi. What a misleading ?
No comments:
Post a Comment